It's possible to update the information on Hopper or report it as discontinued, duplicated or spam. The list of alternatives was updated Mar 2019 There is a history of all activites on Hopper in our Activity Log. Hopper was added by bSr43 in Mar 2011 and the latest update was made in Apr 2018. While - is selected, navigate to the “Window -> Show Pseudo Code of Procedure” menu item. Keep pulling those strings, unraveling a little bit at a time.Main category / Development Sub category / Compilers Developer / Cryptic Apps Filesize / 34202 Title / Hopper Disassembler Hopper Disassembler 4.5.11- Useful Source Repositories: Exploiting CVE-2017-5123 Filter by language The disassembly is helpful, but you can make it much easier to understand by transforming it into pseudo code. There's a whole skill set you'll need to develop, much like debugging. And here you face intentional impediments and (likely) obfuscation. Reverse engineering is almost always hard. If it does, start fuzzing some of the value (either in the executable format/framing, or in the bootstrap sequence). This can also be combined with the slicing approach once you know a snippet of the hopper bootstrap, slice that into a hypothesized short executable and see if hopper recognizes it. But suss out how the program loads up and establishes its beachhead. It's tedious, painstaking, and can require a fair number of tools or a lot of patience. This can be done in a machine code simulator, a step-by-step instruction debugger, or by hand. Follow the hopper code execution instruction by instruction from its very first instruction executed. This would be like decoding the genome by decoding pieces of it at a time.ĭo what virus-hunters do. You will need an automated testing rig for this, because the number of variations you are likely to need to test to get positive results is very large. On those pieces you might try varying degrees of fuzzing (i.e. You will probably need to know what the proper executable format is and conform your slices to that, so that you're not presenting it an apparently random sequence of bytes, but something that is plausibly an executable. by creating copies of the executable that are slices out of the original. You may be able to subvert this by divide and conquer: e.g. One technique they may be using is hashing various byte sequences within their own executable, then looking for such sequences when they disassemble. Hypothesize defenses and experiment with ways to defeat them. Competitors aren't likely to care if you disassemble hopper. ![]() Start the easiest way: Use a different disassembler. ![]() Reverse engineering is inherently hard, like untangling a tight knot, even in the best case. by finding "the answer" on the Internet, which you're already trying), or (ii) be very persistent, tenacious, and disciplined. So if you're really intent on disassembling this, you will need to either (i) get lucky (e.g. And by dint of them being a disassembler team, they know a good many of them. ![]() And the really bad news: There are a lot of different ways to impede discovery. The developers of your disassembler clearly understood that "hey, let's try this on itself!" would be some folks' first thought. A system that is actively trying to prevent discovery. You have to sit and guess what's going on, try experiments, puzzle over the outcomes, and basically Do Science on the system. Even in the best case, with relatively documented products, APIs, or protocols, there will be a lot of details, edge cases, and most of all, original intent that is not stated. Reverse engineering is inherently a tricky business.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |